A growing number of experts are voicing concern that the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie was not a random or impulsive act, but a carefully executed abduction carried out by more than one person. Among them is Wallace Zeins, a veteran negotiator who spent years handling some of New York’s most complex kidnapping cases. His assessment adds a chilling layer to an investigation that has already shaken both law enforcement and the public.
Speaking in an interview on CNN, Zeins said that based on everything known so far, the idea of a single perpetrator acting alone makes little sense. Nancy Guthrie, eighty-four years old, is described as five feet five inches tall and weighing around 150 pounds. More importantly, she has ongoing health issues that significantly limit her mobility.
“She’s waking up in the middle of the night, she’s not in the best health, she can’t walk fast or run,” Zeins explained. “From a practical standpoint alone, I would think there is more than one person involved in this particular crime.”
That conclusion aligns with what investigators have been quietly signaling as the case unfolds.
Nancy Guthrie was last seen on Saturday evening, January 31, after having dinner with her daughter Annie. Annie dropped her off at her Tucson home around 9:30 p.m. Nothing about the evening appeared unusual. There were no signs of distress, no indication that Nancy believed she was in danger.
By Sunday morning, alarm bells began to ring. Nancy failed to attend church, something her family says simply never happened. By midday, after repeated attempts to reach her failed, she was officially reported missing.
Sheriff Chris Nanos quickly moved to shut down speculation that Nancy may have wandered off on her own. He made it clear that she does not suffer from dementia or cognitive impairment and was fully aware of her surroundings.
“She is as sharp as a tack,” Nanos said publicly. “Her family wants everybody to know this is not somebody who just wandered off.”
When deputies searched Nancy’s home, several unsettling details emerged. Her Apple Watch was found inside the house, left behind. Shortly after, a law enforcement source revealed that Nancy’s pacemaker stopped syncing with the device around 2:00 a.m. Sunday. Investigators have not publicly explained what that interruption signifies, but the timing has become a critical focus of the case.
There were also reports of blood traces found outside Nancy’s front door. Police have not confirmed whether the blood belongs to her, but they have acknowledged the discovery and confirmed that forensic testing is underway. Even more troubling, a security camera from the front of the home appears to be missing.
To Zeins, these details point away from chance and toward control.
“In abductions that are spontaneous, you usually see chaos,” he noted. “Noise, witnesses, mistakes. Here, what you’re seeing is silence. That’s often a sign of planning.”
As concern intensified, Sheriff Nanos issued a rare and emotional plea directly to whoever may be responsible.
“Just call us. Let her go. Just call us,” he said. “We do not need another bad, tragic ending.”
Behind the scenes, investigators are working through a growing list of unanswered questions. What was Nancy wearing that night? Was she taken on foot or moved into a vehicle? Did the perpetrators know her routine in advance? And why was that particular night chosen?
Adding to the complexity are reports that multiple media outlets received alleged ransom notes demanding millions of dollars in Bitcoin in exchange for Nancy’s safe return. The outlets reportedly included TMZ and local Arizona stations. Sheriff Nanos has not confirmed the authenticity of the notes, nor whether the information in them matches evidence found at the scene. He has confirmed, however, that the notes were shared with Savannah Guthrie.
Zeins believes the ransom angle could ultimately become a breakthrough rather than a setback. A demand for cryptocurrency suggests the perpetrators are digitally literate, possibly active online, and potentially traceable through mistakes in communication.
“If it’s handwritten, you’re looking at possible DNA,” he said. “If it’s typed, there’s an electronic footprint. Either way, that’s something law enforcement knows how to work with.”
At the same time, authorities are bracing for the downside of intense public attention. CNN correspondent Josh Campbell warned that high-profile cases often generate a flood of tips that range from helpful to malicious.
“In situations like this, police are overwhelmed with information,” Campbell said. “Some tips are credible, some are noise, and some can be downright sinister.”
Former FBI profiler Candice DeLong added another sobering perspective. In cases involving elderly victims, she noted, the abductor is often someone the victim knows.
“In the vast majority of kidnappings involving people over eighty, the offender is known to the victim,” DeLong explained. “That doesn’t mean it’s always family, but it does mean familiarity plays a role.”
As the investigation widens, search efforts near Nancy’s home have intensified. Police helicopters have been seen sweeping nearby desert terrain as part of a structured grid search, a method designed to ensure that no area is overlooked. Zeins suggested this could indicate investigators are trying to determine whether Nancy was moved through the surrounding fields before being taken elsewhere.
The case has reached the highest levels of attention. Donald Trump said Wednesday night that he had spoken with Savannah and was deploying federal resources to assist in the search. The FBI is now offering a $2,500 reward for information that leads to helpful tips.
As the pressure mounts, Savannah Guthrie has stepped away from her professional obligations, including her planned role hosting the 2026 Winter Olympics opening ceremony. NBC confirmed she made the decision to focus entirely on her family.
On Wednesday night, Savannah released an emotional video alongside her siblings, speaking directly to whoever may be holding their mother. The message was not aggressive. It was deliberate, careful, and deeply personal.
“We are ready to talk,” Savannah said. “But we need to know, without a doubt, that she is alive and that you have her.”
She acknowledged reports of a ransom note but emphasized caution, noting how easily voices and images can be manipulated. The family’s request was simple: proof of life, and communication.
As one observer wrote online, capturing the collective unease, “Targeting an elderly person like this is really sick.”
For now, investigators continue to work methodically, piecing together timelines, forensic evidence, and behavioral patterns. Experts agree on one point: whatever happened to Nancy Guthrie does not appear to be accidental. It shows signs of forethought, coordination, and intent.
And until answers come, the case remains what it has been from the start—a quiet house, a missing woman, and a growing belief that someone out there knows exactly what they did, and when they did it.
Leave a Reply